Assessment Basics

Cre­at­ing a new course or review­ing a cur­rent course can be a great oppor­tu­ni­ty to reflect on and adjust stu­dent assess­ments. Effec­tive, rig­or­ous assess­ments can be facil­i­tat­ed in any learn­ing envi­ron­ment.

Watch the 2‑minute video to the right to learn some key con­sid­er­a­tions when think­ing about assess­ment.

To effec­tive­ly explore assess­ment, it is essen­tial to under­stand the fun­da­men­tal prin­ci­ples. Prin­ci­ples refer to a set of guide­lines that should be adhered to when design­ing and con­duct­ing assess­ments ensur­ing they are fair, reli­able, and rel­e­vant to the learn­ing out­comes. Essen­tial­ly, they pro­vide a frame­work for cre­at­ing eval­u­a­tions that accu­rate­ly mea­sure a student’s knowl­edge and capa­bil­i­ties.

https://youtu.be/TibnESb7xbM?si=FAJvsEn53Z3CKcKK
Design­ing good assess­ment, QLD­STud­iesAuthor­i­ty

Teach Any­where iden­ti­fies prin­ci­ples of assess­ment with a trans­la­tion of how instruc­tors can inte­grate the infor­ma­tion into their own teach­ing prac­tice.

The con­cept of “how much is enough” in assess­ment refers to the min­i­mum amount of data or evi­dence required to accu­rate­ly eval­u­ate a person’s skills or per­for­mance. This varies based on con­text, learn­ing out­comes and the desired lev­el of detail.

  • The spe­cif­ic objec­tives of the assess­ment: Is it a high stake or a low stakes assess­ment? Memo­r­i­al Uni­ver­si­ty pro­vides clear delin­eation as to what con­sti­tutes high/low stakes assess­ments.
  • The devel­op­men­tal stage of the learn­er. For instance, expec­ta­tions for an elec­tri­cal foun­da­tions stu­dent dif­fer from those of a fourth-year elec­tri­cal appren­tice­ship stu­dent.
  • Align­ment with course learn­ing out­comes.
  • Ade­quate time allo­ca­tion for stu­dents to achieve the desired results.
  • Insti­tu­tion­al poli­cies, such as NIC’s Pol­i­cy 3–33 — Eval­u­a­tion of stu­dent per­for­mance.

Building assignments: Understanding Backward Design

Back­ward design is an instruc­tion­al approach that aligns edu­ca­tion­al goals with assess­ments and learn­ing activ­i­ties. This method ensures pur­pose­ful teach­ing and the achieve­ment of desired learn­ing out­comes. The process involves three stages: iden­ti­fy­ing desired results, deter­min­ing accept­able evi­dence, and plan­ning learn­ing activ­i­ties. Each stage is out­lined to pro­vide a com­pre­hen­sive under­stand­ing of back­ward design.

What do I want students to know how to do when they leave this course?

The first stage of back­ward design involves clear­ly defin­ing what stu­dents should know and be able to do by the end of a learn­ing expe­ri­ence. This includes set­ting spe­cif­ic learn­ing out­comes that are aligned with edu­ca­tion­al stan­dards. Instruc­tors must con­sid­er the big ideas and essen­tial ques­tions that will guide the learn­ing process. By estab­lish­ing these desired results upfront, instruc­tors can cre­ate a focused and coher­ent cur­ricu­lum that address­es the needs of their stu­dents.

What kinds of tasks will reveal whether students have achieved the learning objectives I have identified?

Once the desired results are iden­ti­fied, the next step is to deter­mine how to assess whether stu­dents have achieved those out­comes. This stage involves select­ing appro­pri­ate assess­ment meth­ods that will pro­vide evi­dence of stu­dent learn­ing. Instruc­tors should con­sid­er both for­ma­tive assess­ments (ongo­ing checks for under­stand­ing) and sum­ma­tive assess­ments (final eval­u­a­tions) to gauge stu­dent progress. The goal is to ensure that the assess­ments are aligned with the desired results and accu­rate­ly mea­sure stu­dent under­stand­ing and skills.

What kinds of activities in and out of class will reinforce the learning objectives and prepare students for assessments?

The final stage of back­ward design is to plan the learn­ing activ­i­ties that will help stu­dents achieve the desired results and pre­pare them for the assess­ments. This involves design­ing engag­ing and effec­tive instruc­tion­al strate­gies that cater to diverse learn­ing styles and needs. Instruc­tors should con­sid­er the sequence and pac­ing of the activ­i­ties, as well as the resources and mate­ri­als required. The learn­ing activ­i­ties should be pur­pose­ful and direct­ly linked to the desired out­comes, ensur­ing that stu­dents are active­ly engaged in their learn­ing process.

Using an align­ment resource such as the Course Out­line Chart can sup­port instruc­tors to get start­ed with con­struc­tive align­ment and pro­vide clar­i­ty and direc­tion for stu­dents about what is expect­ed in a course and how they will get there.

Hav­ing an under­stand­ing of basic assess­ment prin­ci­ples and insti­tu­tion­al pol­i­cy is key when design­ing assess­ments for a course. Back­ward design is a pow­er­ful frame­work for instruc­tors to enhance their teach­ing prac­tices and improve stu­dent learn­ing out­comes. By start­ing with the end in mind, instruc­tors can cre­ate a more focused and effec­tive cur­ricu­lum that aligns assess­ments with learn­ing out­comes. The three-stage process of iden­ti­fy­ing desired results, deter­min­ing accept­able evi­dence, and plan­ning learn­ing activ­i­ties pro­vides a struc­tured approach to instruc­tion­al design that ben­e­fits both instruc­tors and stu­dents and is a reflec­tive process.