Group Work: Cooperative vs Collaborative
Cooperative and Collaborative Learning: These two terms are often used interchangeably, but it’s useful to maintain some distinction. Each approach leverages the social dimension of learning in a slightly different way.
Cooperative Learning
Cooperative learning focuses on asking students to interact in highly structured ways to process ideas and information, or practice skills. “Think-Pair-Share” is a classic example of a cooperative learning technique in that it asks students to cooperate temporarily for a specific learning purpose. In cooperative learning the interaction with peers does not normally factor into the evaluation of the student’s individual performance. The limited scope of cooperative work in the classroom means that it can be incorporated fairly easily into just about any course format or content.
Some Common Examples of Cooperative Learning include:
- Think/Pair/Share
- Cooperative note-taking
- Structured controversies
- Debates
- Jigsaws
Collaborative Learning
Collaborative learning, on the other hand, asks students to work collectively to produce something for which group members share responsibility. For planning purposes, therefore, collaborative learning is more consequential for decisions made at the level of curriculum, course design, and evaluation of learning. Of particular importance, the collaborative approach needs to give students some flexibility and freedom of action, so that groups are able to accommodate the particular needs of group members as they learn to work as a unit.
Important to keep in mind are the logistical and time burdens put on students by collaborative projects that are designed to take place outside of class. Coordinating busy schedules and tracking down student peers takes enormous energy that is not directly relevant to the learning goals of a project. Ensure that students are given some time in class to organize themselves and to touch base at key moments in the course of preparing out-of-class projects.