Valuing the Challenge: How Desirable Difficulties Enhance Motivation and Learning

I first encoun­tered the term “desir­able dif­fi­cul­ties” in Mar­sha Lovett’s (2023) book  How Learn­ing Works. I was intrigued by this seem­ing­ly con­tra­dic­to­ry state­ment about teach­ing and learn­ing. Lovett spoke about how mak­ing learn­ing chal­leng­ing  for stu­dents can be ben­e­fi­cial. Sure­ly, I am not going to make learn­ing too dif­fi­cult espe­cial­ly in a way that is sup­pos­ed­ly “desir­able.” What does that even mean? How does that lend itself to the stu­dent instruc­tor rela­tion­ship I thought? It turns out that in the con­text of cog­ni­tive psy­chol­o­gy, it all makes per­fect sense.

Desir­able dif­fi­cul­ty is a phrase that was coined by Robert Bjork in the 90’s and sim­ply put are chal­lenges or obsta­cles in the learn­ing process that while ini­tial­ly make learn­ing more dif­fi­cult, lead to bet­ter long-term reten­tion and deep­er under­stand­ing of con­tent. When stu­dents are faced with com­plex prob­lems, they are forced to engage more active­ly with the con­tent, think crit­i­cal­ly, and devel­op prob­lem – solv­ing skills.

How dif­fi­cult is dif­fi­cult?

Lovett (2023) empha­sizes the impor­tance of find­ing the “sweet spot” between desir­able and unde­sir­able dif­fi­cul­ties to cre­ate chal­lenges that enhance learn­ing with­out over­whelm­ing stu­dents. Evi­dence shows that strate­gies like spaced prac­tice and elab­o­ra­tion, while more dif­fi­cult for the stu­dent, help instruc­tors find bal­ance. For instance, spac­ing out learn­ing over time and revis­it­ing pre­vi­ous­ly learned infor­ma­tion encour­ages stu­dents to have to retrieve infor­ma­tion they may be on the verge of for­get­ting. Ask­ing stu­dents to elab­o­rate on their knowl­edge by explain­ing con­cepts in their own words or teach­ing one anoth­er are “desir­ably dif­fi­cult” activ­i­ties and well sup­port­ed by years of evi­dence in cog­ni­tive psy­chol­o­gy. In my expe­ri­ence with stu­dents, con­cept maps are anoth­er great way for stu­dents to demon­strate how they are mak­ing con­nec­tions and pro­vide a visu­al of their work. I have had stu­dents stand back after com­ple­tion of a con­cept map and declare ” look at how much we know.” 

Find­ing the “sweet spot” also helps to keep stu­dents moti­vat­ed and engaged. If a task is too com­plex or makes no sense to the stu­dent, they may be hard pushed to find val­ue in the activ­i­ty which can lead to dis­en­gage­ment and demo­ti­va­tion. Moti­va­tion plays a cru­cial role in learn­ing and is heav­i­ly influ­enced by the val­ue stu­dents place on a task.

When stu­dents find val­ue in the dif­fi­cul­ty, moti­va­tion to engage with the task increas­es. For instance, when I have shared how con­cept map­ping can help stu­dents make impor­tant con­nec­tions, stu­dents have report­ed using this tech­nique to study effec­tive­ly on their own time.

Acti­vat­ing pri­or knowl­edge to engage and moti­vate stu­dents, a con­cept  I also learned from Lovett’s book can also help find the “sweet spot.”  When instruc­tors begin an activ­i­ty by assess­ing what stu­dents already know on the top­ic, it offers sev­er­al ben­e­fits. First­ly, it allows for cor­rec­tion or rein­force­ment of any inac­cu­rate pri­or knowl­edge. Sec­ond­ly, it is encour­ag­ing for stu­dents when they already know some­thing on a top­ic — they seem to want more. Famil­iar­i­ty with con­tent makes it eas­i­er to build upon because neu­ronal path­ways are already acti­vat­ed mak­ing learn­ing more engag­ing and valu­able. In my class I acti­vate pri­or knowl­edge through meth­ods like brain dumps and think pair share. It’s as sim­ple as that!

Once you under­stand what stu­dents know about a top­ic then you can scaf­fold the learn­ing expe­ri­ence and lev­el things up by mak­ing learn­ing  “desir­ably dif­fi­cult.” By doing an ini­tial sweep of pri­or knowl­edge, you can deter­mine the appro­pri­ate lev­el of chal­lenge and inform stu­dents that they will face more demand­ing tasks. Explain the pur­pose of these chal­lenges and how they will aid in learn­ing. A bit of light­heart­ed com­pe­ti­tion can be ben­e­fi­cial.

Embrac­ing desir­able dif­fi­cul­ties not only enhances learn­ing but also fos­ters a more engag­ing and moti­vat­ing learn­ing envi­ron­ment. When stu­dents are chal­lenged and ready for it, they find it moti­vat­ing, espe­cial­ly if they see the val­ue in the task. While it may require a bit of patience and per­se­ver­ance for you and for them, the long-term rewards are well worth the effort.

Con­tact: Rachel Goodliffe ( HHS Teach­ing and Learn­ing con­sul­tant) to learn more.

Ref­er­ence

  • Lovett et al (2023). How Learn­ing Works. 2nd ed. Jossey ‑Bass