Examples in Action

Metacog­ni­tive Learn­ing Strat­e­gy aware­ness Activ­i­ty Pre-Assess­ment of Con­tent Activ­i­ty Con­cept Map­ping & Visu­al Study Tools Activ­i­ty
Class­room Assess­ment Tools


There are many ways to include Metacog­ni­tive prac­tice into a class­room. Each of the below prac­tice seeks to enlight­en the stu­dent of their own thresh­old of knowl­edge, or self-guide the stu­dent in real­iz­ing the degree of knowl­edge or under­stand­ing they cur­rent­ly have on a con­cept or top­ic.

Metacognitive Learning Strategy awareness Activity

Engage your stu­dents at the begin­ning of the semes­ter with an activ­i­ty that helps estab­lish the con­nec­tion between study meth­ods and their con­nec­tion to Knowl­edge of Cog­ni­tion. Have stu­dents fill out this hand­out: Approach­es to Learn­ing Chart (3 Approach­es) – PDF Ver­sion.

After stu­dents have placed a check mark or X beside each state­ment, pro­vide the fol­low­ing def­i­n­i­tions:

  • Deep Approach­es to Learn­ing: Stu­dents exam­ine the sig­nif­i­cance of what they are learn­ing, try to make sense of it, con­nect and think more elab­o­rate­ly and holis­ti­cal­ly about the top­ic. They devel­op their own under­stand­ings of new knowl­edge from inte­grat­ing it into their exist­ing knowl­edge struc­tures and crit­i­cal­ly ana­lyze the new infor­ma­tion com­ing in. Stu­dents tend to read beyond the course expec­ta­tions, have a high moti­va­tion to learn and make use of evi­dence, inquiry, and eval­u­a­tion skills through­out their study­ing. This approach usu­al­ly results in greater suc­cess with retain­ing infor­ma­tion and recall­ing it eas­i­er.
  • Strate­gic Approach­es to Learn­ing: Stu­dents orga­nize their learn­ing with the inten­tion to achieve high scores/grades or oth­er pos­i­tive out­comes. Learn­ers orga­nize their time and dis­trib­ute their effort to the great­est effect. They seek out pre­vi­ous exams and assign­ments to pre­dict ques­tions. Strate­gic learn­ers use both shallow/surface and deep strate­gies depend­ing on what is being learned or what time they have avail­able. Strate­gic learn­ing works best when it is more close­ly aligned with deep approach­es.
  • Shal­low or Sur­face Approach­es to Learn­ing: Stu­dents focus on dis­crete details and pieces of infor­ma­tion that they feel is impor­tant to learn. There is an empha­sis on mem­o­riz­ing these pieces of infor­ma­tion that false­ly gives the learn­er a sense of com­pre­hen­sion of the whole pic­ture. The learn­ing approach is nar­row as they con­cen­trate on details (def­i­n­i­tions, key words, the­o­ries, etc.). Stu­dents focus on repro­duc­ing uncon­nect­ed facts that they think will help them in a test or exam. Stu­dents focus on “what do I need to pass the test”. Learn­ing is super­fi­cial and does not pro­mote real under­stand­ing.

Now ask your stu­dents to deter­mine which def­i­n­i­tion match­es the state­ments in each of the 3 blocked areas of the chart. By com­plet­ing this self-assess­ment activ­i­ty, stu­dents are faced with a sum­ma­ry of their own per­son­al learn­ing strate­gies and a sense of their effec­tive­ness through the above def­i­n­i­tions. For those who strong­ly align with deep strate­gies, excel­lent news. For those who instead align with most­ly shal­low strate­gies, this pro­vides space to pause and con­sid­er next steps. This sim­ple activ­i­ty can help your stu­dents devel­op fur­ther Metacog­ni­tive aware­ness of their own learn­ing path.

Top of Page

Pre-Assessment of Content Activity

Find­ing out what stu­dents already know about a top­ic can help stu­dents begin to think about how learn­ing works. This activ­i­ty requires stu­dents to real­ly con­sid­er and per­son­al­ly eval­u­ate the depth of knowl­edge they pos­sess on a giv­en top­ic. Through this self-reflec­tion stu­dents are fur­ther devel­op­ing their metacog­ni­tive skills. Here is one way to con­duct a pre-assess­ment (or a stu­dent self-assess­ment) of new con­tent.

  1. Cre­ate a few key ques­tions about the content/topic. Give the ques­tions to stu­dents a week or two pri­or to when the top­ic will be dis­cussed in class. Ques­tions should focus on ask­ing stu­dents what they know already about the top­ic, pos­si­ble iden­ti­fi­ca­tion of any mis­con­cep­tions they have about the top­ic, chal­lenges or suc­cess­es they have had with the top­ic, explo­ration into past expe­ri­ences or appli­ca­tions of the content/topic. These ques­tions may be in the form of a home­work assign­ment, an in-class poll, a short reflec­tive writ­ing piece done in class and hand­ed in etc.
  2. Have the stu­dents indi­vid­u­al­ly hand in their respons­es anony­mous­ly. Skim through the answers after class. Pos­si­bly categorize/summarize all respons­es by themes.
  3. Share respons­es with stu­dents the next class either ver­bal­ly or a sum­ma­ry of themes.
  4. Have a dis­cus­sion with stu­dents about how these ques­tions can help them in thought­ful plan­ning of how they might approach a new idea or top­ic or how they will approach course con­tent and asso­ci­at­ed studying/learning strate­gies.

Top of Page

Concept Mapping & Visual Study Tools Activity

Con­cept maps help stu­dents to be cre­ative and see the con­nec­tions between mul­ti­ple con­cepts or top­ic areas all on the same page. The act of con­cept map­ping requires a metacog­ni­tive out­look to seek out con­nec­tions and cor­re­la­tions between dif­fer­ent top­ics with­in a course, or cours­es with­in a pro­gram. The visu­al arrange­ment of bit sized infor­ma­tion helps stu­dents to see the over­all pic­ture, rather than get­ting bogged-down in spe­cif­ic details. When con­duct­ed as a group activ­i­ty, more voic­es and con­nec­tions can be gen­er­at­ed that may not have been con­sid­ered by each stu­dent indi­vid­u­al­ly. As these con­nec­tions are ana­lyzed, each stu­dent must con­sid­er their own thoughts on con­nec­tions and impli­ca­tions for what is writ­ten. Do they agree with every­thing pro­posed? Do they desire fur­ther expla­na­tion or ratio­nale for an arrow or top­ic? Are there inac­cu­ra­cies? Each of these actions helps stu­dents to devel­op their metacog­ni­tion.

Below is an exam­ple of a par­tial mind map for a biol­o­gy course. This can be cre­at­ed quick­ly and free with class col­lab­o­ra­tion with many dif­fer­ent online plat­forms. This one is a Pub­lic Dia­gram that can be used as a tem­plate for any top­ic pro­vid­ed by Cog­gle.

Here is anoth­er AI dri­ven app that can assist in mak­ing mind maps

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top of Page

Classroom Assessment Tools

There are many short activ­i­ties you can do dur­ing class time that will help pro­mote metacog­ni­tive think­ing in your stu­dents. Some­times these lit­tle activ­i­ties are called “Class­room Assess­ment Tools” or sim­ply “CATS”. Below is a sam­pling of a few tools to con­sid­er with your stu­dents. Each tool takes a few min­utes to do in class and min­i­mal time to plan before­hand. The intent of CATS is to pro­vide imme­di­ate feed­back to stu­dents, and some­times also fac­ul­ty, on the depth of under­stand­ing each per­son has on a top­ic or con­cept. CATS are best deployed through­out the learn­ing jour­ney to cre­ate time for stu­dents to pause, eval­u­ate their learn­ing, and make adjust­ments if nec­es­sary. A larg­er list of CATS is avail­able.

Assess­ment Method Descrip­tion How To Use
Tick­et-Out-The-Door Dur­ing the last few min­utes of class, stu­dents write a response to a ques­tion or two about class con­cepts or a ques­tion or two about how the learn­ing expe­ri­ence was for them etc. Hand in as exit­ing the class. Review/read all before next class and use to clar­i­fy, cor­rect or elab­o­rate more for stu­dents.
One Minute Paper Dur­ing the last few min­utes of class, stu­dents write response to “Most impor­tant thing I learned today” and “What I under­stood the least today”. Review/read all before next class and use to clar­i­fy, cor­rect or elab­o­rate more for stu­dents.
Mud­di­est Point Sim­i­lar to One-Minute Paper – but only ask stu­dents to describe what they didn’t under­stand dur­ing class and what they think might help them under­stand bet­ter. Same as One-Minute Paper but if many stu­dents have same prob­lem, reteach con­cept anoth­er way.
Stu­dent-Gen­er­at­ed Test Ques­tions Divide the class into groups and assign each group a top­ic on which they are to each write a ques­tion and answer. Use as many of the ques­tions as pos­si­ble on next test.
Mem­o­ry Matrix Stu­dents fill in cells of a two-dimen­sion­al dia­gram with instruc­tor-pro­vid­ed labels such as a com­par­i­son chart out­lin­ing sim­i­lar­i­ties and dif­fer­ences in two columns against a vari­ety of con­cepts in the dis­ci­pline. Tal­ly the num­ber of cor­rect and incor­rect respons­es. Look for pat­terns amongst the incor­rect respons­es. Address in class.
K‑W-L Chart Label three charts K (What I KNOW Already), W (What I WANT to Know) and L (What I have LEARNED). Com­plete the first two before a unit/topic and the last one at end. Dis­cuss with stu­dents – their per­cep­tions of what they thought they knew, what they have come to know etc.
Direct­ed Para­phras­ing Ask stu­dents to write a layperson’s “trans­la­tion” of some­thing they have just learned (geared for a non-expert audi­ence) to assess their abil­i­ty to comprehend/transfer con­cepts. Cat­e­go­rize stu­dent respons­es accord­ing to char­ac­ter­is­tics you feel are impor­tant. Address in class.
One Sen­tence Sum­ma­ry Stu­dents sum­ma­rize knowl­edge of a top­ic by con­struct­ing a sin­gle sen­tence to cov­er the core con­cept. The pur­pose is to require stu­dents to select only the defin­ing fea­tures of an idea. Eval­u­ate the qual­i­ty of each sum­ma­ry in brief fash­ion. Note if stu­dents have iden­ti­fied the core con­cepts of the class top­ic. Share with stu­dents.
Think-Pair-Share Give the class a ques­tion. Allow every­one to think on own for a few min­utes jot­ting down some thoughts. Then ask stu­dents to pair up with a peer and dis­cuss thoughts for anoth­er few min­utes. Can do groups of 4 as well. Ask to share with whole class. Use when you want to have a bet­ter dis­cus­sion by a greater num­ber of stu­dents. By think­ing alone first and with small groups of peers, shared respons­es should be rich­er and more var­ied.
Appli­ca­tion Cards After teach­ing a the­o­ry, prin­ci­ple or pro­ce­dure, ask stu­dents to write down at least one real-world appli­ca­tion for what they have just learned to deter­mine if they can see the trans­fer of their recent learn­ing. Quick­ly read through once and cat­e­go­rize them accord­ing to qual­i­ty. Pick out a broad range of exam­ples to share with the class the next day.
Class­room Opin­ion Polls Using ‘click­ers’, or online polling ques­tions, ask stu­dents a vari­ety of ques­tions about a top­ic and seek their anony­mous opin­ion. Often polling devices can present imme­di­ate results back to the class to pro­vide dis­cus­sion and next steps.
Week­ly Report Writ­ten by stu­dents each week in which they address three ques­tions: What did I learn this week? What ques­tions remain unclear? And What ques­tions would you ask your stu­dents if you were the instruc­tor to find out if they under­stood the mate­r­i­al? Read at end of each week, cat­e­go­rize respons­es and share with class. Fol­low up on unclear ques­tions with class or small group of stu­dents.
Con­cept Tests Instruc­tor presents one or more ques­tions dur­ing class involv­ing key con­cepts, along with sev­er­al pos­si­ble answers (mul­ti­ple choice). Stu­dents indi­cate (by show of hands, or poll/clicker vot­ing) which answer they think is cor­rect. If most of the class has not iden­ti­fied cor­rect answer, stu­dents are giv­en a short time to per­suade their neighbor(s) that their answer is cor­rect. The ques­tion is asked a sec­ond time to gauge class mas­tery. Often lasts a few min­utes but uncov­ers mis­un­der­stand­ings, and great con­ver­sa­tion amongst stu­dents. Share answer after sec­ond vot­ing ses­sion to see how the class respons­es changed or didn’t change.
Instruc­tor Meet­ings Instruc­tor meets infor­mal­ly with stu­dents either in class or after class to answer ques­tions, inquire about con­cep­tu­al under­stand­ing or pro­vide feed­back on stu­dent learn­ing. Design spe­cif­ic ques­tions to help guide the meet­ing and address con­cepts and under­stand­ings you want to know more about.

The below videos are from the K. Patri­cia Cross Acad­e­my. Although not every resource pro­vid­ed on the their web­site is “metacog­ni­tive” in nature, they pro­vide many pow­er­ful tools and exam­ples of best prac­tice for post-sec­ondary edu­ca­tors. From the K. Patri­cia Cross Acad­e­my web­site:

“We are ded­i­cat­ed to sup­port­ing fac­ul­ty by offer­ing free instruc­tion­al videos, down­load­able resources, and Cross­Cur­rent arti­cles that clear­ly out­line how to:

  1. Imple­ment high-impact, evi­dence-based teach­ing tech­niques that improve all stu­dents’ learn­ing; and
  2. Doc­u­ment stu­dent learn­ing in ways that pro­vide the infor­ma­tion teach­ers need to improve their teach­ing as well as assist them in their efforts for hir­ing, tenure, and pro­mo­tion”


Link: https://kpcrossacademy.ua.edu/techniques/lecture-wrapper/


Link: https://kpcrossacademy.ua.edu/techniques/think-pair-share/

Top of Page